Shortly before the holidays, I had an remarkable incident. I believe it proved instructive. This happened at a meeting of a group of longtime companions, who happen to be dental professionals, but it's not relevant. The present crowd were exclusively male, which turns out to be significant.
The establishment was a tavern experiencing a brisk business. A wasted daytime was shared by the group. Nice fare, fine libations and remarkably amusing anecdotes about dentistry. Inevitably, the time arrived for trips to the men's room. Those who ventured off, I vaguely observed, seemed to be away a long time. I didnāt dwell on why this might have been, but when it was me next, everything was revealed.
Upon turning the bend, and what should I find but a sizeable procession for the men's restroom. An empty space for the womenās toilet, but a considerable queue for the men's. What bizarre turn was this? This was an unfamiliar scene any of us in this queue recognised.
Let me state unequivocally, I am not asking for sympathy from any woman here. I am fully aware that, for females, having to queue to use a convenience is standard practice. Repeatedly have I observed women waiting in a row while men in the comparable place have to do no such thing?
Apart from the annoyance of having to queue to use a convenience, thereās a hint of humiliation about standing there, waiting for something that men typically donāt have to experience. It was decidedly enlightening to experience a dose of it myself, watching the other sex breeze through the entrance while I was compelled to stand solemnly in line with my companions, looking distractedly at anything we had in our pockets and scrolling through our mobile devices.
Thereās a entire style of dialogue here ā restroom waiting talk ā of which men have minimal familiarity. Women, I surmise, have become adept to be fairly skilled at it, sharing polite remarks and an notable insight or two.
Regarding this Iāve polled some lady acquaintances of my acquaintance. The prevailing view is that queue-based interaction is restricted to the rare eye roll and the phrase: āForget this, Iām going to use the male.ā A workmate mentioned itās exclusively at the sinks afterwards that conversation tends to break out.
If I was a lady, Iād refrain from on both pleasantries or silence. If I was obliged, repeatedly, to wait in a common queue only for the privilege to relieve myself, Iād express my fury like nobodyās business at the sheer injustice of it. A valuable benchmark for any modern culture would be balanced access in wee queue durations. Iām seeking out data on this.
During my time in my queue, I endeavoured to spark some male camaraderie going about this new situation of ours. I clicked my tongue a bit, rolled my eyes and remarked something to the effect of: āWell, this makes an irksome change, doesnāt it chaps?ā
Someone smiled, a second seemed nonplussed, a third looked sheepish. Another shook his head as if this was yet another manifestation of modern woes, woke madness etc. Otherwise, stillness reigned. An individual came out, fastening his trousers. The group shuffled up a spot. Two more men entered the rear of it. I sighed.
A woman wafted out of the next-door toilet, all fragrant and at ease. It was perfectly okay for some. I grinned apologetically at her, attempting to communicate an understanding of this reversed scenario. Her response was: āDon't turn to me for sympathy, you jerk. Reappear when youāve experienced this another hundred times and only then I may give you the time.ā
In reality, she didnāt say that. She didnāt say nothing. But I am convinced thatās what she was implying. And I honestly wouldnāt fault her.
Evelyn Thorne is a seasoned journalist with over a decade of experience covering UK politics and social issues, known for her sharp analysis and engaging storytelling.